GED Reading Comprehension Practice Questions, Set 5
This is set 5 of 5 for GED Reading Comprehension, with 18 practice questions that are not part of any full practice test. If a question type feels unfamiliar, review the Reading Comprehension study guide first, then check each answer below.
Question 1 of 18
0 answered
Passage 1 “Our district should move to a four-day school week next fall. Each school day would run about an hour longer, so students would lose little class time over the year. We would save on bus fuel, heating, and substitute teachers, money we could put toward raises. That matters: last year we posted eleven teaching jobs and filled only four. Nearby districts that switched report more applicants, and teachers tell us a three-day weekend is worth more to them than a small raise. Families would also gain a day for medical appointments, which in our county can mean a two-hour drive.” Passage 2 “A four-day week sounds efficient until you ask who watches the children on Fridays. In our county, most parents work five days, many of them at the plant or the hospital. A sixth grader cannot stay home alone all day, and paid child care is hard to find here. A study of districts in one Western state found that students on four-day schedules lost ground in math compared with similar students on five-day schedules, especially in later grades. The savings are also smaller than they sound. Buildings still need heat on Fridays if sports and clubs use them, and many districts that switched report saving only one or two percent of their budgets.” On which point would the two writers most likely agree?
Reading Comprehension practice set 5: 18 questions with answers
Work each question on paper first, then open the answer to check your reasoning.
Use this passage for questions 1 to 4
Passage 1 “Our district should move to a four-day school week next fall. Each school day would run about an hour longer, so students would lose little class time over the year. We would save on bus fuel, heating, and substitute teachers, money we could put toward raises. That matters: last year we posted eleven teaching jobs and filled only four. Nearby districts that switched report more applicants, and teachers tell us a three-day weekend is worth more to them than a small raise. Families would also gain a day for medical appointments, which in our county can mean a two-hour drive.” Passage 2 “A four-day week sounds efficient until you ask who watches the children on Fridays. In our county, most parents work five days, many of them at the plant or the hospital. A sixth grader cannot stay home alone all day, and paid child care is hard to find here. A study of districts in one Western state found that students on four-day schedules lost ground in math compared with similar students on five-day schedules, especially in later grades. The savings are also smaller than they sound. Buildings still need heat on Fridays if sports and clubs use them, and many districts that switched report saving only one or two percent of their budgets.”
1.On which point would the two writers most likely agree?
- A.A four-day week would save the district at least some money
- B.Students would learn as much in four longer days as in five
- C.Parents in the county could easily find child care on Fridays
- D.A four-day week would help the district hire more teachers
Show answer
Answer: A. A four-day week would save the district at least some money
Passage 2 says the savings are “smaller than they sound,” which accepts that some savings exist. The hiring choice is tempting, but only Passage 1 makes that argument.
2.Which evidence in Passage 1 most directly supports the claim that the change would help the district hire teachers?
- A.Each school day would run about an hour longer than it does now
- B.Families would gain a day for medical appointments each week
- C.The district would save on bus fuel, heating, and substitutes
- D.Nearby districts that switched report receiving more applicants
Show answer
Answer: D. Nearby districts that switched report receiving more applicants
Reports of more applicants in districts that switched speak directly to hiring. The savings choice is tempting because the money could fund raises, but that link to hiring is indirect.
3.How does Passage 2 respond to the claim in Passage 1 that students “would lose little class time”?
- A.It points out that sports and clubs would take up the extra hour each day
- B.It cites a study that found students on four-day schedules fell behind in math
- C.It argues that longer school days would make students too tired to learn well
- D.It agrees but argues that the savings are too small to justify the change
Show answer
Answer: B. It cites a study that found students on four-day schedules fell behind in math
The study suggests that a shorter week can cost students learning even if total hours stay similar. The “agrees” choice is tempting because Passage 2 does question the savings, but it also challenges the learning claim directly.
4.Which statement best describes a weakness in Passage 1?
- A.It does not address who would care for younger children on Fridays
- B.It admits that the four-day week would cost more than it saves
- C.It relies only on the opinions of parents who oppose the plan
- D.It gives no reason why the district would want to save money at all
Show answer
Answer: A. It does not address who would care for younger children on Fridays
Passage 1 never mentions child care, the main concern raised in Passage 2. The choice about saving money is wrong because Passage 1 explains that the savings could pay for raises.
Use this passage for questions 5 to 8
“Dolores had worked the grill at the Starlite Diner for so long that the regulars called the night shift “Dolores’s hours.” She did not talk while she cooked. She listened to the bacon. The new dishwasher, Kwame, talked enough for both of them. In his first hour he told her about his bus route, his little brother’s soccer team, and the community college class he was taking in accounting. Dolores answered with nods. Once she said, “Mm.” At two in the morning the rush came all at once, a dozen tickets from a bowling league. Plates came back faster than Kwame could wash them, and Dolores ran out of clean ones with four orders up. She turned to tell him to hurry and saw that he already was, sleeves soaked to the elbow, stacking the plates in the order she would need them: big ovals first, then the small rounds for toast. She had not told him that. No one had. When the league finally left, Dolores cracked two eggs on the grill, though no ticket asked for them. She slid the plate across the steel counter toward the sink. “Accounting,” she said. “You’ll be good at it.” Kwame grinned and ate standing up.”
5.The detail that Dolores “listened to the bacon” suggests that she
- A.has trouble hearing the orders that servers call out to her
- B.is unhappy that the diner has hired a dishwasher who talks
- C.is bored by her job and lets her mind wander during shifts
- D.pays close attention to her cooking and dislikes distractions
Show answer
Answer: D. pays close attention to her cooking and dislikes distractions
Listening to the bacon shows she cooks by careful attention, and the sentence before says she does not talk while she cooks. The choice about the talkative dishwasher is tempting, but nothing shows she is unhappy that he was hired.
6.Why does Dolores most likely stop when she sees how Kwame is stacking the plates?
- A.She notices that he is working too slowly to keep up with her
- B.She is upset that he is stacking the plates in the wrong order
- C.She realizes he has been paying closer attention than she thought
- D.She remembers that she forgot to tell him to work faster
Show answer
Answer: C. She realizes he has been paying closer attention than she thought
He is stacking the plates in the order she needs them, something “no one” told him, so he has been watching carefully. The “too slowly” choice is tempting, but she finds that he is already hurrying.
7.Why does Dolores cook two eggs that “no ticket asked for”?
- A.To use up eggs that would spoil before the next shift
- B.To thank Kwame and show that she respects his work
- C.To get Kwame to stop talking for the rest of the night
- D.To test a new recipe before adding it to the menu
Show answer
Answer: B. To thank Kwame and show that she respects his work
She slides the plate to Kwame and mentions his accounting class, showing she listened and appreciates him. The choice about getting him to stop talking is tempting, but she starts a conversation instead.
8.Which theme is best supported by the passage?
- A.Respect can be earned through actions as much as through words
- B.Talking too much at work keeps people from doing their jobs well
- C.Quiet people are usually unfriendly to the people they work with
- D.A busy rush is the best time to train a new restaurant worker
Show answer
Answer: A. Respect can be earned through actions as much as through words
Kwame wins Dolores’s respect by how he works, and she shows it with a plate of eggs more than with words. The choice about talking too much is tempting, but Kwame talks a lot and still does his job well.
Use this passage for questions 9 to 11
“Automatic Refills at Crestview Pharmacy Starting May 1, you can sign up to have eligible prescriptions refilled automatically. When a refill is due, we will prepare it and send you a text or phone call when it is ready for pickup. You will not need to call in or use the app. Not every medicine qualifies. Automatic refills are available only for prescriptions you take every day for an ongoing condition, such as blood pressure or cholesterol medicine. Controlled substances, including many pain and sleep medicines, cannot be refilled automatically under state law. If your prescription has no refills left, we will contact your doctor’s office to request a new one. This can take up to three business days, so please plan ahead. Prescriptions that are not picked up within ten days of the ready notice will be returned to stock, and your insurance will be credited. You will stay enrolled, and your next refill will be prepared on schedule. To sign up, ask any pharmacy team member or check the box on your next prescription form. You can cancel at any time.”
9.A customer enrolled in automatic refills forgets to pick up a blood pressure refill for two weeks. Based on the notice, what happens?
- A.The refill is returned to stock, and the customer stays enrolled
- B.The customer is removed from the program and must sign up again
- C.The pharmacy calls the doctor’s office to ask for a new prescription
- D.The refill is held at the counter until the customer picks it up
Show answer
Answer: A. The refill is returned to stock, and the customer stays enrolled
Refills not picked up within ten days are returned to stock, and “you will stay enrolled.” Being removed from the program is tempting, but the notice says the next refill is still prepared on schedule.
10.According to the notice, which prescription could NOT be refilled automatically?
- A.A daily blood pressure medicine with refills left
- B.A daily cholesterol medicine taken for years
- C.A daily medicine that has no refills remaining
- D.A sleep medicine that is a controlled substance
Show answer
Answer: D. A sleep medicine that is a controlled substance
The notice says controlled substances, including many sleep medicines, cannot be refilled automatically under state law. The choice with no refills remaining is tempting, but the pharmacy simply contacts the doctor for a new prescription.
11.Why does the notice include the sentence “This can take up to three business days, so please plan ahead”?
- A.To suggest that doctors’ offices often refuse to send prescriptions
- B.To explain how long it takes to sign up for the automatic program
- C.To tell readers how many days they have to pick up each refill
- D.To warn readers that a new prescription may not be ready right away
Show answer
Answer: D. To warn readers that a new prescription may not be ready right away
The sentence follows the step where the pharmacy asks the doctor for a new prescription, so it warns of a possible delay. The pickup choice is tempting, but the pickup window is ten days and appears in a later paragraph.
Use this passage for questions 12 to 15
“To the Editor: The city council will soon decide whether to spend $400,000 to restart the Summer Youth Jobs Program, which paid teenagers to work six weeks at parks, libraries, and nonprofits until it was cut in 2020. The council should restore it. A summer job teaches things a classroom cannot: showing up on time, taking direction, and handling a paycheck. I know because the program gave me my first job, painting picnic shelters at Lakeview Park when I was fifteen. My supervisor, a parks worker named Mr. Haynes, was the first adult outside my family to tell me I did good work. The benefits go beyond one person’s memories. When the program last ran, it placed 300 teenagers, and the parks department reported that its crews finished the summer maintenance list for the first time in years. Studies of similar programs in large cities have found that summer jobs can reduce violent-crime arrests among the teens who take part. Some council members say the city cannot afford it. But $400,000 is less than one half of one percent of this year’s budget. Surely we can find that much for the young people who will one day run this city. Terrell Wynn”
12.Which statement offers the weakest support for the writer’s claim?
- A.The parks department’s report that crews finished the maintenance list
- B.The writer’s memory of a supervisor praising his work at fifteen
- C.Studies that found fewer violent-crime arrests in similar programs
- D.The number of teenagers that the program placed when it last ran
Show answer
Answer: B. The writer’s memory of a supervisor praising his work at fifteen
One person’s memory is an anecdote and cannot show how the program affects most teens. The writer even admits this by saying “the benefits go beyond one person’s memories.” The number placed is tempting, but it is a measurable fact about the program’s reach.
13.Which statement from the letter expresses an opinion rather than a fact?
- A.“$400,000 is less than one half of one percent of this year’s budget.”
- B.“The program gave me my first job.”
- C.“A summer job teaches things a classroom cannot.”
- D.“When the program last ran, it placed 300 teenagers.”
Show answer
Answer: C. “A summer job teaches things a classroom cannot.”
Whether a job teaches what a classroom cannot is a judgment that people could disagree with. The budget statement is tempting because it supports an argument, but it can be checked against the city’s numbers.
14.What is the main purpose of the fourth paragraph?
- A.To describe the work the teenagers did in the city’s parks
- B.To explain why the program was cut in the first place
- C.To give more evidence that summer jobs reduce crime
- D.To answer the objection that the program costs too much
Show answer
Answer: D. To answer the objection that the program costs too much
The paragraph opens with “Some council members say the city cannot afford it” and then responds with the budget figure. The choice about why the program was cut is tempting, but the letter never explains the 2020 cut.
15.The phrase “Surely we can find that much” gives the end of the letter a tone that is
- A.doubtful and uneasy
- B.angry and threatening
- C.confident and pointed
- D.playful and joking
Show answer
Answer: C. confident and pointed
“Surely” expresses confidence, and the phrase presses the council by suggesting the cost is easy to cover. “Angry and threatening” is tempting because the line challenges the council, but it makes no threat.
Use this passage for questions 16 to 18
“In 1944, with World War II still underway, Congress passed the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, better known as the GI Bill. Lawmakers remembered what had happened after World War I, when many returning veterans struggled to find work, and they feared a wave of unemployment when millions of service members came home at once. The law offered several benefits. Veterans could receive unemployment pay for up to a year while they looked for work. They could get government-backed loans with low down payments to buy homes, farms, or businesses. Most famously, the law paid college or job-training tuition and gave veterans a monthly living allowance while they studied. Few officials expected many veterans to use the education benefit. Instead, it became one of the most popular parts of the law. By 1956, when the original program ended, millions of veterans had used it to attend college or train for a trade, and some campuses doubled in size. The benefits did not reach everyone equally. The law was carried out largely by state and local officials, and in many places Black veterans were steered away from loans or turned away by segregated colleges. Historians still debate how much the law narrowed gaps between groups and how much it widened them.”
16.Why does the author mention what happened after World War I?
- A.To show that World War I veterans later received the same benefits
- B.To explain why lawmakers wanted to help returning veterans find work
- C.To argue that the GI Bill should have been passed after World War I
- D.To compare the number of soldiers who served in the two world wars
Show answer
Answer: B. To explain why lawmakers wanted to help returning veterans find work
Lawmakers remembered that veterans of the earlier war “struggled to find work” and feared the same problem. The choice about the GI Bill being passed earlier is tempting, but the author makes no such argument.
17.In the third paragraph, the word “Instead” mainly signals
- A.a list of more benefits that veterans received under the law
- B.a contrast between what officials expected and what happened
- C.a shift from describing the law to describing the war’s end
- D.a cause of the problems veterans faced in finding work later
Show answer
Answer: B. a contrast between what officials expected and what happened
Officials expected few veterans to use the benefit, and “Instead” introduces the opposite result: it became one of the most popular parts. The list choice is tempting, but the benefits are listed in the second paragraph.
18.Which conclusion is best supported by the final paragraph?
- A.Black veterans were not legally allowed to receive the law’s benefits
- B.Historians agree that the GI Bill closed gaps between groups of veterans
- C.The law’s benefits depended partly on how local officials applied it
- D.Most veterans chose job training over college because loans were scarce
Show answer
Answer: C. The law’s benefits depended partly on how local officials applied it
The paragraph says the law was carried out by state and local officials, and in many places Black veterans were steered away or turned away. The choice about legal exclusion is tempting, but the problem described is how the law was carried out, not its wording.
More practice sets
Reading Comprehension has 5 practice sets. None of these questions appear in the full practice tests.
- Set 1: 26 questions
- Set 2: 26 questions
- Set 3: 29 questions
- Set 4: 29 questions
- Set 5: 18 questions (this page)